<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polyamory Will Save the World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maymay.net/blog/2005/03/21/polyamory-will-save-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maymay.net/blog/2005/03/21/polyamory-will-save-the-world/</link>
	<description>The brutally honest, first-person account of Meitar Moscovitz&#039;s life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 07:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Moscovitz</title>
		<link>http://maymay.net/blog/2005/03/21/polyamory-will-save-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-3313</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Moscovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=213#comment-3313</guid>
		<description>Indeed a good read. The issue is loaded. Too much for a simple reply. While I can agree with most statements, I can quite easily cojure compelling statements to the contrary. Packaging a &quot;lifestyle&quot; under a term, monogamy or polyamory, is so easy. Making it a good, satisfying and successful way of being is not easy. Hell, life is not easy. I do not believe it was ever meant to be easy. Yet, discussing it with integrity is helpfull.
I will read this again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed a good read. The issue is loaded. Too much for a simple reply. While I can agree with most statements, I can quite easily cojure compelling statements to the contrary. Packaging a &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; under a term, monogamy or polyamory, is so easy. Making it a good, satisfying and successful way of being is not easy. Hell, life is not easy. I do not believe it was ever meant to be easy. Yet, discussing it with integrity is helpfull.<br />
I will read this again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banjk</title>
		<link>http://maymay.net/blog/2005/03/21/polyamory-will-save-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>Banjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=213#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>AHH!  Polyamory!  Run!  I&#039;ve seen this in action so many times!  Run!  Scary!  Arrrrgh!

Only 1 of many cases have I seen it work...and that&#039;s only because of 1 person making it work...not the combined whole.

-Banjk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHH!  Polyamory!  Run!  I&#8217;ve seen this in action so many times!  Run!  Scary!  Arrrrgh!</p>
<p>Only 1 of many cases have I seen it work&#8230;and that&#8217;s only because of 1 person making it work&#8230;not the combined whole.</p>
<p>-Banjk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

